글로벌 생체 내 독성학 시장 – 2024-2031

Global In Vivo Toxicology Market - 2024-2031

상품코드BT7895
발행기관DataM Intelligence
발행일2024.02.09
페이지 수186 Pages
포맷PDF + EXCEL
커버리지Global

6,525,00011,775,000

보고서 요약(국문)

개요
글로벌 생체 내 독성학 시장은 2023년 XX백만 달러에 도달했으며, 2024년부터 2031년까지 연평균 XX%의 성장률을 기록하며 2031년에는 XX백만 달러에 이를 것으로 예상됩니다.
생체 내 독성학은 살아있는 유기체에 대한 물질의 독성 효과를 연구하는 독성학의 한 분야입니다. "생체 내(in vivo)"라는 용어는 라틴어로 "살아있는 것 안에서"를 의미하며, 이 맥락에서는 일반적으로 동물과 같은 살아있는 유기체 내에서 수행되는 실험 또는 연구를 가리킵니다. 생체 내 독성학의 목표는 특정 물질에 대한 노출이 장기, 조직 및 시스템을 포함한 전체 유기체에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 이해하는 것입니다.
생체 내 독성학은 의약품, 화학 물질, 식품 첨가물, 화장품 및 살충제를 포함한 광범위한 제품의 안전성을 평가하는 데 중요한 역할을 합니다. 잠재적 위험을 식별하고, 안전 노출 한계를 설정하고, 안전한 사용을 위한 지침을 수립하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 제약 산업에서 생체 내 독성학 연구는 신약 개발에 필수적입니다. 이러한 기술은 잠재적인 독성 효과를 식별하고, 안전한 투여량을 결정하며, 전임상 및 임상 개발 단계에서 의사 결정 과정에 기여합니다.
시장 동향: 성장 동력
기술 발전의 증가
생체 내 독성 연구를 위한 기술 및 방법론의 지속적인 발전은 평가의 효율성과 정확성을 향상시킵니다. 향상된 영상 기술, 분자 생물학 도구 및 데이터 분석 방법과 같은 혁신은 시장 성장에 기여합니다. 예를 들어, 차세대 체외 모델의 선도적인 공급업체인 Emulate, Inc.는 2022년 12월 전임상 개발에서 예측 독성을 위한 오르간 온 어 칩(Organ-on-a-Chip) 기술의 유효성을 검증하는 획기적인 연구 결과를 발표했습니다.
제약 회사는 의약품 개발에서 많은 어려움에 직면할 수 있습니다. 특히 생물학적 제제의 경우, 전임상 연구에서 유망한 결과를 보이는 화합물도 전임상 모델의 예측 타당성이 낮아 임상 시험에서 실패율이 높은 경우가 많습니다. 따라서 연구진은 Emulate 인간 간 칩(Human Liver-Chip)의 일상적인 사용이 의약품 개발 생산성에 미칠 수 있는 잠재적인 경제적 영향도 모델링했습니다.

또한, NIH 2022에 따르면 머신러닝과 인공지능 접근 방식은 독성학을 포함한 여러 학문 분야에 혁명을 일으켰습니다. 머신러닝과 인공지능을 활용하면 이제 수백 가지 화학물질에 대한 PBPK 모델을 효율적으로 개발하고, 생체 내 동물 실험과 유사한 정확도로 다수의 화학물질에 대한 독성을 예측하는 컴퓨터 모델을 구축하며, 다양한 유형의 데이터(독성유전체학, 고해상도 이미지 데이터 등)를 대량으로 분석하여 독성 메커니즘에 대한 새로운 통찰력을 신속하게 도출할 수 있습니다. 이는 과거에는 수동적인 접근 방식으로는 불가능했던 일입니다. 따라서 이러한 요인들이 시장 성장을 가속화하는 데 기여하고 있습니다.
시장 동향: 제약 요인
동물 모델 사용 관련 엄격한 규제
엄격한 규제는 생체 내 독성학 시장에 여러 가지 어려움을 초래할 수 있습니다. 규제는 제품의 안전성과 효능을 보장하기 위해 시행되지만, 때로는 의도치 않게 생체 내 독성학 연구 수행에 드는 비용, 시간, 실현 가능성에 영향을 미치는 결과를 낳을 수 있습니다. 엄격한 규정으로 인해 포괄적이고 철저한 시험 프로토콜이 요구되는 경우가 많아 생체 내 독성 연구 수행 비용이 전반적으로 증가합니다.
기업은 까다로운 규제 요건을 충족하기 위해 상당한 재정 자원을 투입해야 할 수 있으며, 이는 소규모 기업이나 예산이 제한적인 기업에게는 장벽이 될 수 있습니다. 예를 들어, 2011년 6월 14일에 발효된 규정 1107/2009는 대체 방법이 있는 경우 척추동물에 대한 불필요한 시험을 피하고, 중복 시험을 방지하며, 척추동물을 이용한 시험 및 연구 결과를 공유하도록 규정하는 등 여러 요건을 명시하고 있습니다. 따라서 이러한 요인들이 시장 성장을 저해합니다.
세분화 분석
글로벌 생체 내 독성 시장은 제품 유형, 시험 유형, 기술, 최종 사용자 및 지역별로 세분화됩니다.

제품 유형 부문 중 키트 부문은 생체 내 독성학 유형 시장 점유율의 약 39.7%를 차지했습니다.
생체 내 독성학 키트는 독성학 연구를 발전시키고 간소화하는 데 중요한 역할을 하며, 연구자들에게 생체 내 물질의 영향을 평가하기 위한 표준화된 도구와 분석법을 제공합니다. 생체 내 독성학 키트의 중요성은 독성 평가의 효율성, 재현성 및 데이터 품질을 향상시키는 능력에 있습니다.
예를 들어, 생체 내 독성학 키트는 다양한 독성학적 매개변수를 평가하기 위한 표준화된 분석법과 프로토콜을 제공합니다. 이러한 표준화는 실험 간 일관성을 보장하여 연구 및 실험실 간 결과 비교를 용이하게 합니다. 키트는 미리 포장된 시약과 프로토콜을 제공하여 분석법 최적화 및 준비에 필요한 시간과 노력을 줄여줍니다. 이는 생체 내 독성학 연구의 전반적인 효율성을 높이고 연구자들이 데이터 해석 및 분석에 집중할 수 있도록 합니다.
예를 들어, EpiDerm은 정상 인간 표피 각질세포를 투과성 폴리카보네이트 막에 배양한 것입니다. 또한, 생체 내 독성학 키트는 생산 과정에서 엄격한 품질 관리 조치를 거칩니다. 이는 시약의 일관성과 신뢰성을 보장하여 실험 오류 위험을 줄이고 생성되는 데이터의 전반적인 품질을 향상시킵니다. 따라서 이러한 요인들이 해당 부문의 성장을 촉진하는 데 기여합니다.
지역 분석
북미는 2022년 시장 점유율의 약 32.4%를 차지했습니다.
이 지역은 미국에서 활동하는 주요 기업들의 존재, 미국 내 생의학 연구의 성장, CRO 및 제약 회사의 전임상 활동 증가, 상당한 정부 지원, 의무적인 독성 시험 규정 및 간소화된 독성 가이드라인의 혜택을 받아 연구 건수가 증가하고 있습니다.
파트너십은 미국 생체 내 독성학 시장의 성장과 혁신을 촉진하는 데 중요한 역할을 합니다. 제약 회사, CRO, 학술 기관 및 기술 제공업체와 같은 다양한 이해 관계자 간의 협력은 연구 방법론의 발전, 서비스 제공 범위 확대 및 역량 향상에 기여할 수 있습니다. 예를 들어, 2023년 11월, 사이프로텍스는 미국 제약 대기업인 화이자와 전임상 개발 단계에서의 예측적 체외 독성학에 중점을 둔 18개월 파트너십 계약을 체결했습니다.
또한, 미국 식품의약국(FDA)과 같은 기관이 관장하는 미국 규제 환경은 의약품 승인, 환경 평가 및 기타 제품 등록을 위한 규제 제출의 일환으로 포괄적인 생체 내 독성학 데이터 제출을 의무화하고 있습니다. 따라서 위의 요인들은 해당 지역의 성장을 촉진하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
COVID-19 영향 분석
COVID-19 팬데믹은 생체 내 독성학 연구를 포함한 과학 연구 및 생명 과학 산업 전반에 다양한 영향을 미쳤습니다. 생체 내 독성학 연구를 수행하는 연구소를 포함한 많은 연구소들이 봉쇄, 사회적 거리두기 조치 및 인력 부족으로 인해 일시적인 폐쇄 또는 연구 중단을 경험했습니다. 이로 인해 진행 중인 연구가 지연되고 계획된 실험이 연기되었습니다.

팬데믹은 동물 연구에 영향을 미쳤는데, 인력 부족과 운영상의 어려움으로 인해 동물 사육 및 실험 수행에 차질이 생겼기 때문입니다. 연구자들은 연구 동물의 복지를 보장하고 연구 일정을 준수하는 데 어려움을 겪었습니다. 생체 내 독성 연구 완료 지연은 신약 및 기타 제품의 규제 기관 제출 연기로 이어졌습니다. 이는 결국 규제 승인 및 제품 출시 일정에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.
팬데믹으로 인해 잠재적 치료제 및 백신의 안전성과 효능 연구와 같이 COVID-19 관련 특정 유형의 생체 내 연구에 대한 수요가 증가했습니다. 이러한 수요는 중요한 요구 사항을 충족하는 동시에 자원 경쟁을 유발하고 독성학 연구 전반에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.
시장 세분화
제품 유형별
• 키트
• 시약
• 장비
시험 유형별
• 아만성 독성 시험
• 만성 독성 시험
• 발암성 시험
• 기타
기술별
• 생체 내 영상
• 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션 모델
• 오믹스 기술
최종 사용자별
• 제약 및 생명공학 회사
• 임상시험수탁기관(CRO)
• 학술 및 연구 기관
지역별
• 북미
o 미국
o 캐나다
o 멕시코
• 유럽
o 독일
o 영국
o 프랑스
o 이탈리아
o 스페인
o 기타 유럽
• 남미
o 브라질
o 아르헨티나
o 기타 남미
• 아시아 태평양
o 중국
o 인도
o 일본
o 호주
o 기타 아시아 태평양
• 중동 및 아프리카
경쟁 환경
시장의 주요 글로벌 업체 MATTEK CORPORATION, Vimta Labs Ltd, Merck KGaA, NUVISAN GmbH, Charles River Laboratories, Eurofins Scientific, Nagi Bioscience, Labcorp Drug Development, PerkinElmer Inc, Taconic Biosciences 등이 포함됩니다.
주요 개발 사항
• 2023년 9월, 제약 분야 인공지능(AI) 기업인 Quris-AI는 독일 다름슈타트에 위치한 Merck KGaA와의 협력을 확대했습니다. 이는 기존의 시험관 내 및 생체 내 접근법과 비교하여 Quris-AI의 약물 독성 예측 능력을 평가하는 전임상 연구를 성공적으로 완료한 초기 협력에 이은 것입니다.

• 2022년 1월 10일, Inotiv, Inc는 Sier Capital Partners(“Sier Capital”)의 포트폴리오 회사인 Integrated Laboratory Systems, LLC(“ILS”) 인수를 완료했습니다. ILS는 노스캐롤라이나주 모리스빌에 위치한 계약 연구 기관으로, 유전 독성학, 생체 내외 독성학, 병리학, 분자 생물학, 생물정보학 및 전산 독성학 서비스를 전문으로 제공합니다.
보고서 ​​구매 이유:

• 제품 유형, 시험 유형, 기술, 최종 사용자 및 지역별 글로벌 생체 내 독성학 시장 세분화를 시각화하고 주요 상업 자산 및 업체들을 파악합니다.

• 트렌드 분석 및 공동 개발을 통해 사업 기회를 발굴합니다.

• 모든 세그먼트를 포함한 생체 내 독성학 시장 수준의 다양한 데이터 포인트가 담긴 Excel 데이터 시트를 제공합니다.

• 심층적인 질적 인터뷰와 연구를 바탕으로 종합적인 분석을 담은 PDF 보고서를 제공합니다.

• 주요 업체들의 핵심 제품을 모두 포함하는 제품 맵핑 Excel 파일을 제공합니다.

글로벌 생체 내 독성학 시장 보고서는 약 64개의 표, 61개의 그림, 186페이지로 구성됩니다.

2023년 목표 고객층
• 제조업체/구매자
• 산업 투자자/투자 은행가
• 시장 조사 전문가
• 신흥 기업

보고서 요약(영어 원문)

Overview
Global In Vivo Toxicology Market reached US$ XX million in 2023 and is expected to reach US$XXmillion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period 2024-2031.
In vivo toxicology is a branch of toxicology that involves the study of the toxic effects of substances on living organisms. The term "in vivo" is Latin for "within the living," and in this context, it refers to experiments or studies conducted within a living organism, typically animals. The goal of in vivo toxicology is to understand how exposure to certain substances affects the whole organism, including its organs, tissues, and systems.
In vivo toxicology plays a key role in assessing the safety of a wide range of products, including pharmaceutical drugs, chemicals, food additives, cosmetics, and pesticides. It helps identify potential hazards, set safe exposure limits, and establish guidelines for safe use. In the pharmaceutical industry, in vivo toxicology studies are integral to drug development. They help identify potential toxic effects, determine safe dosage levels, and contribute to the decision-making process during preclinical and clinical development phases.
Market Dynamics: Drivers
Rising the technological advancements
The ongoing advancements in technology and methodologies for in vivo toxicology studies enhance the efficiency and accuracy of assessments. Innovations such as improved imaging techniques, molecular biology tools, and data analysis methods contribute to the growth of the market. For instance, in December 2022, Emulate, Inc., the leading provider of next-generation in vitro models, stated the emulate publishes landmark study validating Organ-on-a-Chip technology for predictive toxicology in preclinical development.
Pharmaceutical companies can encounter many challenges in developing human drugs. Often, compounds showing promise in preclinical efforts face high attrition during human trials due to poor predictive validity of preclinical models, especially for biologics. Therefore, the researchers also modeled the potential economic impact that routine use of the Emulate human Liver-Chip could have on drug development productivity.
Additionally, according to NIH 2022, machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches have revolutionized multiple disciplines, including toxicology. By leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches, now it is possible to develop PBPK models for hundreds of chemicals efficiently, to create in silico models to predict toxicity for a large number of chemicals with similar accuracies compared with in vivo animal experiments, and to analyze a large amount of different types of data (toxicogenomics, high-content image data, etc.) to generate new insights into toxicity mechanisms rapidly, which was impossible by manual approaches in the past. Thus above factors helps to accelerates the market growth.
Market Dynamics: Restraints
The stringent regulations releated to use animal models
Stringent regulations can pose challenges to the in vivo toxicology market in several ways. While regulations are implemented to ensure the safety and efficacy of products, their stringency can sometimes have unintended consequences that impact the cost, time, and feasibility of conducting in vivo toxicology studies. Stringent regulations often require comprehensive and rigorous testing protocols, increasing the overall cost of conducting in vivo toxicology studies.
Companies may need to allocate significant financial resources to meet the demanding regulatory requirements, which can be a barrier for smaller companies or those with limited budgets. For instance, regulation 1107/2009 came into force on 14 June 2011 and lays down a number of requirements aimed at avoiding unnecessary testing on vertebrate animals, where alternative methods are available, avoiding duplicate testing and prescribing sharing of tests and studies involving vertebrate animals. Thus above factors restrain the market growth.
Segment Analysis
The global In Vivo toxicology market is segmented based on product type, test type, technology, end user, and region.
The kits segment from the product type segment accounted for approximately 39.7% of In Vivo Toxicology type share
In vivo toxicology kits play a crucial role in advancing and streamlining toxicology studies, providing researchers with standardized tools and assays for evaluating the effects of substances in living organisms. The importance of in vivo toxicology kits lies in their ability to enhance efficiency, reproducibility, and data quality in toxicological assessments.
For instance, in vivo toxicology kits offer standardized assays and protocols for assessing various toxicological parameters. This standardization helps ensure consistency across experiments, making it easier to compare results between studies and laboratories. Kits provide pre-packaged reagents and protocols, reducing the time and effort required for assay optimization and preparation. This enhances the overall efficiency of in vivo toxicology studies and allows researchers to focus on data interpretation and analysis.
For instance, EpiDerm, normal human epidermal keratinocytes and cultured on a permeable polycarbonate membrane. Furthermore, in vivo toxicology kits are subject to rigorous quality control measures during production. This ensures the consistency and reliability of the reagents, reducing the risk of experimental errors and enhancing the overall quality of data generated. Thus above factors helps to boost the segment growth.
Geographical Analysis
North America accounted for approximately 32.4% of the market share in 2022
The region benefits from the presence of major players operating in the US, growing biomedical research in the US, rising preclinical activities by CROs and pharmaceutical companies in the region, significant government support, mandatory toxicology testing rules, and simplified toxicology guidelines, resulting in a higher number of studies.
Partnerships play a significant role in fostering growth and innovation in the in vivo toxicology market in the U.S. Collaborative efforts between different stakeholders, such as pharmaceutical companies, contract research organizations (CROs), academic institutions, and technology providers, can contribute to advancements in research methodologies, expanded service offerings, and improved capabilities. For instance, in November 2023, Cyprotex had signed an 18-month partnered with U.S. drug giant Pfizer focused on predictive in-vitro toxicology in preclinical development.
Furthermore, the U.S. regulatory landscape, governed by agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), mandates the submission of comprehensive in vivo toxicology data as part of regulatory submissions for drug approvals, environmental assessments, and other product registrations. Thus above factors help to boost the region growth.
COVID-19 Impact Analysis
The COVID-19 pandemic has had various impacts on scientific research and the broader life sciences industry, including in vivo toxicology studies. Many research laboratories, including those conducting in vivo toxicology studies, experienced temporary closures or disruptions due to lockdowns, social distancing measures, and workforce limitations. This led to delays in ongoing studies and the postponement of planned experiments.
The pandemic had implications for studies involving animals, as maintaining animal colonies and conducting experiments were affected by staffing shortages and operational challenges. Researchers faced difficulties in ensuring the welfare of research animals and maintaining study timelines. Delays in completing in vivo toxicology studies contributed to postponed regulatory submissions for new drugs and other products. This, in turn, could impact the timelines for regulatory approvals and product launches.
The pandemic increased the demand for specific types of in vivo studies related to COVID-19, such as studies on the safety and efficacy of potential treatments and vaccines. This demand, while addressing critical needs, could create resource competition and impact the broader spectrum of toxicology research
Market Segmentation
By Product Type
• Kits
• Reagents
• Equipments
By Test Type
• Subchronic Toxicity Tests
• Chronic Toxicity Tests
• Carcinogenicity Tests
• Others
By Technology
• In vivo Imaging
• In Silico Models
• Omics Technologies
By End User
• Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies
• Contract Research Organizations (CROs)
• Academic and Research Institutions
By Region
• North America
o U.S.
o Canada
o Mexico
• Europe
o Germany
o UK
o France
o Italy
o Spain
o Rest of Europe
• South America
o Brazil
o Argentina
o Rest of South America
• Asia-Pacific
o China
o India
o Japan
o Australia
o Rest of Asia-Pacific
• Middle East and Africa
Competitive Landscape
The major global players in the market include MATTEK CORPORATION, Vimta Labs Ltd, Merck KGaA, NUVISAN GmbH, Charles River Laboratories, Eurofins Scientific, Nagi Bioscience, Labcorp Drug Development, PerkinElmer Inc, Taconic Biosciences among others.
Key Developments
• In September 2023, Quris-AI, an artificial intelligence (AI) company in the pharmaceutical space, extended its collaboration with Merck KGaA Darmstadt, Germany. This follows the successful initial collaboration, a preclinical study to assess Quris-AI’s ability to predict drug toxicity in comparison to traditional in vitro and in vivo approaches.
• On January 10, 2022, Inotiv, Inc had completed the acquisition of Integrated Laboratory Systems, LLC (“ILS”), a portfolio company of Sier Capital Partners (“Sier Capital”). ILS is a contract research organization, located in Morrisville, North Carolina, specializing in genetic toxicology, in vivo and in vitro toxicology, pathology, molecular biology, bioinformatics and computational toxicology services
Why Purchase the Report?
• To visualize the global In Vivo toxicology market segmentation based on product type, test type, technology, end user, and regionas well as understandkey commercial assets and players.
• Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
• Excel data sheet with numerous data points of In Vivo toxicology market-level with all segments.
• PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
• Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.
The global In Vivo Toxicology Market report would provide approximately 64tables, 61figures and 186pages.
Target Audience 2023
• Manufacturers/ Buyers
• Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
• Research Professionals
• Emerging Companies

상세 목차

1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report
2. Definition and Overview
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Snippet by Product Type
3.2. Snippet by Test Type
3.3. Snippet by Technology
3.4. Snippet by End User
3.5. Snippet by Region
4. Dynamics
4.1. Impacting Factors
4.1.1. Drivers
4.1.1.1. Increasing prevalence of diseases
4.1.1.2. Rising the technological advancements
4.1.2. Restraints
4.1.2.1. The stringent regulations related to use animal models
4.1.2.2. XX
4.1.3. Opportunity
4.1.4. Impact Analysis
5. Industry Analysis
5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. Patent Analysis
5.6. SWOT Analysis
5.7. DMI Opinion
6. COVID-19 Analysis
6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion
7. By Product Type
7.1. Introduction
7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Product Type
7.2. Kits *
7.2.1. Introduction
7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Reagents
7.4. Equipment
8. By Test Type
8.1. Introduction
8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Test Type
8.2. Subchronic Toxicity Tests *
8.2.1. Introduction
8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Chronic Toxicity Tests
8.4. Carcinogenicity Tests
8.5. Others
9. By Technology
9.1. Introduction
9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
9.2. In vivo Imaging *
9.2.1. Introduction
9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3. In Silico Models
9.4. Omics Technologies
9.5. Others
10. By End User
10.1. Introduction
10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End User
10.2. Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies*
10.2.1. Introduction
10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
10.3. Contract Research Organizations (CROs)
10.4. Academic and Research Institutions
11. By Region
11.1. Introduction
11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
11.2. North America
11.2.1. Introduction
11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
11.2.7.1. U.S.
11.2.7.2. Canada
11.2.7.3. Mexico
11.3. Europe
11.3.1. Introduction
11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
11.3.7.1. Germany
11.3.7.2. UK
11.3.7.3. France
11.3.7.4. Italy
11.3.7.5. Spain
11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
11.4. South America
11.4.1. Introduction
11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
11.4.7.1. Brazil
11.4.7.2. Argentina
11.4.7.3. Rest of South America
11.5. Asia-Pacific
11.5.1. Introduction
11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
11.5.7.1. China
11.5.7.2. India
11.5.7.3. Japan
11.5.7.4. Australia
11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.6. Middle East and Africa
11.6.1. Introduction
11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product Type
11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
12. Competitive Landscape
12.1. Competitive Scenario
12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis
13. Company Profiles
13.1. MATTEK CORPORATION*
13.1.1. Company Overview
13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
13.1.3. Financial Overview
13.1.4. Key Developments
13.2. Vimta Labs Ltd
13.3. Merck KGaA
13.4. NUVISAN GmbH
13.5. Charles River Laboratories
13.6. Eurofins Scientific
13.7. Nagi Bioscience
13.8. Labcorp Drug Development
13.9. PerkinElmer Inc
13.10. Taconic Biosciences LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE
14. Appendix
14.1. About Us and Services
14.2. Contact Us

언급된 주요 기업들

MATTEK CORPORATION, 4. Key Developments, Vimta Labs Ltd, Merck KGaA, NUVISAN GmbH, Charles River Laboratories, Eurofins Scientific, Nagi Bioscience, Labcorp Drug Development, PerkinElmer Inc

표 목록 (Tables)

List of Tables

Table 1 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 2 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 3 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 4 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 5 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Region, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 6 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 7 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 8 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 9 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 10 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 11 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 12 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 13 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 14 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Region, 2023, 2027 & 2031 (US$ Million)

Table 15 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Region,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 16 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 17 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 18 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 19 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 20 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Country,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 21 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 22 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 23 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 24 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 25 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Country,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 26 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 27 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 28 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 29 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 30 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Country,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 31 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 32 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 33 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 34 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 35 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Country,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 36 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Product Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 37 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Test Type,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 38 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By Technology,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 39 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Value, By End-User,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 40 MATTEK CORPORATION: Overview

Table 41 MATTEK CORPORATION: Product Portfolio

Table 42 MATTEK CORPORATION: Key Developments

Table 43 Vimta Labs Ltd: Overview

Table 44 Vimta Labs Ltd: Product Portfolio

Table 45 Vimta Labs Ltd: Key Developments

Table 46 Merck KGaA: Overview

Table 47 Merck KGaA: Product Portfolio

Table 48 Merck KGaA: Key Developments

Table 49 NUVISAN GmbH: Overview

Table 50 NUVISAN GmbH: Product Portfolio

Table 51 NUVISAN GmbH: Key Developments

Table 52 Charles River Laboratories: Overview

Table 53 Charles River Laboratories: Product Portfolio

Table 54 Charles River Laboratories: Key Developments

Table 55 Eurofins Scientific: Overview

Table 56 Eurofins Scientific: Product Portfolio

Table 57 Eurofins Scientific: Key Developments

Table 58 Nagi Bioscience: Overview

Table 59 Nagi Bioscience: Product Portfolio

Table 60 Nagi Bioscience: Key Developments

Table 61 Labcorp Drug Development: Overview

Table 62 Labcorp Drug Development: Product Portfolio

Table 63 Labcorp Drug Development: Key Developments

Table 64 PerkinElmer Inc: Overview

Table 65 PerkinElmer Inc: Product Portfolio

Table 66 PerkinElmer Inc: Key Developments

Table 67 Taconic Biosciences: Overview

Table 68 Taconic Biosciences: Product Portfolio

Table 69 Taconic Biosciences: Key Developments

그림 목록 (Figures)

List of Figures

Figure 1 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 2 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Product Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 3 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Test Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 4 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Technology, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 5 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By End-User, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 6 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Region, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 7 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Product Type, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 8 Kits In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 9 Reagents In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 10 Equipments In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 11 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Test Type, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 12 Subchronic Toxicity Tests Test Type in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 13 Chronic Toxicity Tests Test Type in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 14 Carcinogenicity Tests Test Type in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 15 Others Test Type in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 16 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Technology, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 17 In vivo Imaging Technology in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 18 In Silico Models Technology in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 19 Omics Technologies Technology in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 20 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Y-o-Y Growth, By End-User, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 21 Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies End-User in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 22 Contract Research Organizations (CROs) End-User in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 23 Academic and Research Institutions End-User in Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 24 Global In Vivo Toxicology Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Region, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 25 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 26 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 27 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 28 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 29 Middle East and Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 30 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 31 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Product Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 32 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Test Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 33 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Technology, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 34 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By End-User, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 35 North America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Country, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 36 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 37 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Product Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 38 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Test Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 39 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Technology, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 40 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By End-User, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 41 South America In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Country, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 42 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 43 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Product Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 44 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Test Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 45 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Technology, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 46 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By End-User, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 47 Europe In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Country, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 48 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 49 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Product Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 50 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Test Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 51 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Technology, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 52 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By End-User, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 53 Asia-Pacific In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Country, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 54 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Value,2022-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 55 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Product Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 56 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Test Type, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 57 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By Technology, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 58 Middle East & Africa In Vivo Toxicology Market Share, By End-User, 2022 &2031 (%)

Figure 59 MATTEK CORPORATION: Financials

Figure 60 Vimta Labs Ltd: Financials

Figure 61 Merck KGaA: Financials

Figure 62 NUVISAN GmbH: Financials

Figure 63 Charles River Laboratories: Financials

Figure 64 Eurofins Scientific: Financials

Figure 65 Nagi Bioscience: Financials

Figure 66 Labcorp Drug Development: Financials

Figure 67 PerkinElmer Inc: Financials

Figure 68 Taconic Biosciences: Financials