세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장

Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market

상품코드BT3671
발행기관DataM Intelligence
발행일2023.05.01
페이지 수180 Pages
포맷PDF + EXCEL
커버리지Global

6,525,00011,775,000

보고서 요약(국문)

세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장은 예측 기간(2023-2030년) 동안 10.3%의 높은 연평균 성장률(CAGR)을 기록할 것으로 예상됩니다. 세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅은 시험관 내 세포 배양에서 세포 접착 및 성장을 향상시킵니다. 단백질 코팅된 세포 배양 기기는 최적의 세포 접착 및 증식을 위한 3D 미세 환경을 제공합니다.
시장 동향
줄기세포 연구에 대한 과학자 및 생명공학 기업의 관심 증가가 시장 성장을 견인할 것입니다. 3D 세포 배양 기술의 도입 증가 또한 예측 기간 동안 시장 성장을 촉진할 것입니다.
줄기세포 연구는 동물 유래 줄기세포의 특성과 잠재적 활용 가능성을 연구하는 분야입니다. 줄기세포는 모든 조직의 근원이며, 줄기세포의 특성을 이해함으로써 건강한 신체와 질병 상태의 발달 및 항상성 유지에 대한 이해를 높일 수 있습니다. 줄기세포는 항상 자가 재생과 분화 사이의 균형을 유지합니다. 줄기세포 생물학에 대한 이해와 최신 기술 개발에 따라 줄기세포 배양의 매개변수는 매우 중요하며 지속적으로 개선되어야 합니다. 줄기세포(SC)는 세포 치료, 조직 공학, 동물 유래 재생, 제약 및 생명 공학 응용 분야에서 큰 가능성을 지니고 있습니다. 줄기세포는 자가 복제 능력을 가지고 있으며, 분리 출처에 따라 특수 세포 유형으로 분화할 수 있습니다. 그러나 임상 적용을 위한 줄기세포의 사용에는 높은 품질과 충분한 양의 세포가 필요합니다. 이를 위해서는 줄기세포의 대규모 증식 후 효율적이고 균일한 기능성 유도체로의 분화가 필수적입니다. 기존의 세포 유지 및 개발 방법은 플라스틱 배양 접시와 이종 배지를 사용하는 2차원(2D) 배양 기술에 의존합니다. 이러한 방법은 증식에 한계가 있으며, 장기간 계대 배양 시 세포의 클론성 및 분화 능력이 저하되는 경향이 있습니다.
3차원(3D) 세포 배양의 도입이 증가함에 따라 향후 세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장이 성장할 것으로 예상됩니다.
3차원(3D) 세포 배양 시스템은 생리학적으로 더욱 관련성 높은 정보와 생체 내 시험에 대한 예측 데이터를 제공하는 데 있어 명확한 이점을 제공하기 때문에 신약 개발 및 조직 공학 분야에서 관심이 높아지고 있습니다. 여러 연구 결과에 따르면 2D 배양 시스템과 달리 3D 세포 배양 시스템은 조직 내 세포가 존재하는 실제 미세 환경을 더욱 정확하게 재현하는 것으로 나타났습니다. 따라서 3D 배양 세포의 행동은 생체 내 세포 반응을 더 잘 반영합니다. 3D 배양 환경의 세포는 2D 배양 환경의 세포와 형태학적, 생리학적으로 차이가 있다는 연구 결과가 있습니다. 이러한 세포 반응 차이의 핵심은 3D 배양의 추가적인 차원성입니다. 이는 주변 세포와의 상호작용에 관여하는 세포 표면 수용체의 공간적 배열에 영향을 미칠 뿐만 아니라 세포에 물리적 제약을 가합니다. 3D 배양에서의 이러한 공간적, 물리적 특성은 세포 외부에서 내부로의 신호 전달에 영향을 미치고 궁극적으로 유전자 발현과 세포 행동에 영향을 줍니다. 3D 배양에서의 세포 반응은 2D 배양에서의 반응보다 생체 내 행동과 더 유사하다는 것이 입증되었습니다. 지난 몇 년간 다양한 3D 배양 시스템 개발에 막대한 노력이 기울여졌으며, 신약 개발, 암세포 생물학, 줄기세포 연구, 이식용 기능성 조직 공학 및 기타 세포 기반 분석 분야에서 3D 세포 배양 시스템의 활용이 확대되고 있습니다. 따라서 이는 시장 성장을 견인할 것입니다.
연구 개발 시스템은 세포 접착 정량화 및 부착성 세포주 배양을 위해 무균적으로 제조되고 세포외 기질(ECM) 단백질로 사전 코팅된 다양한 마이크로플레이트를 제공합니다.
하지만 세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅과 관련된 몇 가지 단점이 시장 성장을 저해할 수 있습니다.
세포 배양의 단점은 다음과 같습니다. 고도의 숙련된 인력이 필요하며, 동물 세포는 일반적인 오염원(예: 박테리아, 바이러스, 곰팡이)보다 성장 속도가 느리기 때문에 엄격한 무균 기술을 사용해야 합니다. 또한, 동물 세포는 분리 시 생존하지 못할 수 있으므로, 복잡한 환경을 제공하지 않으면 독립적으로 지속 가능한 생존을 유지하기 어렵습니다. 세포 배양의 주요 한계점 중 하나는 상대적으로 적은 양의 세포를 얻기 위해 많은 비용과 노력이 필요하다는 것입니다.
게다가, 조직 구성은 다양하고 이질적입니다. 동일한 샘플에서 생성된 복제본은 구성 성분이 다양합니다. 실험 결과를 재현하려면 세포주를 여러 번 계대 배양해야 합니다. 예를 들어, 모든 배양액은 원본과 다르며 구성 성분이 균일하지 않습니다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 각 계대 배양에서 복제본을 무작위로 혼합하고, 배양 조건의 선택적 압력으로 최적의 표현형이 나타나도록 합니다. 이러한 단점은 세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장의 성장을 저해할 것입니다.
COVID-19 영향 분석
COVID-19 팬데믹은 전 세계 연구 개발 분야에 영향을 미쳤습니다. 전국적인 봉쇄 조치로 인해 모든 산업이 타격을 입었습니다. 마찬가지로, 세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장도 COVID-19 관련 규정으로 인해 제조업체들이 사업을 중단하면서 영향을 받았습니다.
세그먼트 분석
세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장에서 사전 코팅 부문이 가장 큰 비중을 차지할 것입니다.
코팅은 추가적인 표면 처리로서, 세포 접착력을 향상시키기 위해 제조업체가 모든 세포 배양 플라스틱에 적용하는 표준 플라즈마 또는 코로나 처리 외에 추가적인 변형을 의미합니다. 일반적으로 코팅에는 단백질이나 펩타이드가 사용됩니다. 코닝 바이오코트(Corning BioCoat) 세포 배양 인서트는 세포 접착, 성장, 침윤, 이동 및 분화와 같이 단백질 코팅된 세포 표면이 필요한 응용 분야를 위해 세포외 기질 단백질로 사전 코팅되어 있습니다. 코팅에는 코닝 매트리겔(Matrigel®) 매트릭스, 피브로넥틴, 콜라겐 및 라미닌이 포함됩니다.
합성 소재가 세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장을 주도할 것입니다.
동물성 성분이 없는 구성 요소에 대한 수요 증가가 이 지역 시장을 견인할 것입니다. 합성 소재 시스템은 다양한 규모(예: 분자, 세포 및 거시적 규모)에서 세포와 상호 작용하도록 특별히 설계될 수 있으며, 따라서 자연 줄기세포 틈새의 요소를 모방할 수 있습니다. 이러한 합성 소재는 천연 소재에 비해 향상된 제어, 재현성, 안전성 및 확장성을 제공할 가능성이 있습니다.
줄기세포 표현형을 조절하기 위해 다양한 합성 소재가 설계 및 개발되었습니다. 천연 고분자는 일반적으로 포유류 세포외 기질(ECM)의 구성 요소 또는 다른 유기체의 구조 성분(예: 알긴산염 또는 키토산)으로 구성되며, 화학적, 열적 또는 물리적 처리를 통해 화학적 성질, 역학적 특성, 분해성 및 생물학적 성능을 변화시킬 수 있습니다. 합성 고분자는 다양한 단량체와 공중합체 구조를 이용할 수 있기 때문에 광범위한 화학적 성질과 기계적 특성을 제어할 수 있습니다. 대표적인 합성 고분자로는 폴리아크릴아미드, 폴리아크릴레이트, 폴리에테르, 폴리에스터, 폴리하이드록시산, 폴리푸마르산염 및 폴리포스파젠이 있습니다. 자가 조립 펩타이드, 펩타이드-양친매성 물질 및 유전자 변형 단백질은 특정 세포 결합 모티프를 합리적으로 설계된 화학 생물학적 어셈블리에 통합할 수 있도록 합니다. 무기 재료는 골형성 환경을 모방하는 데 사용되며, 하이브리드 및 복합 재료는 앞서 언급한 재료들을 결합하여 특정 용도에 맞는 고유한 매트릭스를 만듭니다.
지리적 분석
북미 지역이 시장을 주도할 것입니다.
고도로 발달된 의료 및 연구 인프라, 첨단 기술, 그리고 주요 생명공학 기업들의 존재가 이 지역 시장 성장을 견인할 것입니다. 특히 이 지역은 신약 개발에 대한 관심이 높습니다.
비록 작년에는 제약 회사들이 2018년 미국에서 승인된 기록적인 59개의 신약에는 미치지 못했지만, 여전히 성장세를 이어가고 있습니다. 2019년에는 미국 식품의약국(FDA)이 48개의 동물 유래 의약품을 승인했는데, 이는 다양한 치료법과 오랫동안 간과되어 온 질병에 대한 많은 새로운 치료법을 포함하고 있습니다.
2020년 기준 최신 매출에 따르면, 존슨앤존슨(Johnson & Johnson)이 미국 내 최대 제약 회사입니다. 이 회사는 연간 800억 달러 이상의 매출을 올리고 있으며, 이는 2위인 화이자(Pfizer)보다 약 300억 달러 더 많은 금액입니다. 그러나 존슨앤존슨의 총 매출에는 의료기기 및 소비자 건강 사업부의 매출도 포함되어 있는 반면, 화이자는 순수 제약 회사입니다.

경쟁 환경
세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장의 주요 업체로는 Corning Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Merck KGaA, PerkinElmer, Inc., Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, BioVision, Inc., Trevigen Inc., Manus Aktteva Biopharma, Donboo Amino Acid, Wuxi Enovo Chemical, Xinyi Hanling Biological Engineering 등이 있습니다.
주목할 주요 기업
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
개요: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.는 전 세계적으로 240억 달러 이상의 매출과 약 7만 명의 직원을 보유한 세계적인 과학 서비스 선도 기업입니다. 이 회사의 사명은 고객이 더 깨끗하고, 더 건강하고, 더 안전한 세상을 만들 수 있도록 지원하는 것입니다. Thermo Fisher Scientific은 고객이 생명 과학 연구를 가속화하고, 동물 유래 제품을 시장에 출시하고, 환자 진단을 개선하고, 복잡한 분석 문제를 해결하고, 실험실 생산성을 향상시키도록 돕습니다. 이 회사는 Thermo Scientific, Unity Lab Services, Invitrogen, Fisher Scientific 및 Applied Biosystems와 같은 주요 브랜드를 통해 타의 추종을 불허하는 혁신 기술, 편리한 구매 및 포괄적인 서비스를 제공합니다.
제품 포트폴리오: 분석 기기, 실험실 공급망 프로그램 및 전자상거래, 실험실 장비, 실험실 서비스, 특수 진단, 생명 과학, 제약 서비스 및 CDMO.
주요 개발: 2021년 3월 25일, Thermo Fisher Scientific은 Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 Dx 실시간 PCR 시스템의 미국 FDA 승인 완료를 발표했습니다. 이 혁신적인 제품은 임상 실험실과 분석법 개발자가 검사 요구 사항을 충족하고 분자 진단 워크플로를 개선할 수 있도록 지원합니다.
세포 배양 단백질 표면 코팅 시장 보고서는 약 52개의 시장 데이터 표, 44개의 그림 및 200페이지 분량의 자료를 제공합니다.
주요 트렌드
세포 배양 시장
3D 세포 배양 시장
세포 표면 마커 검출 시장

보고서 요약(영어 원문)

The Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market is estimated to reach at a high CAGR 10.3% during the forecast period (2023-2030). Cell culture protein surface coating provides improved cell adhesion and growth of in vitro cell culture. The protein-coated cell culture instruments provide a 3D microenvironment to achieve optimal cell adhesion and proliferation.
Market Dynamics
The increasing interest of scientists and biotechnology companies in stem cell research will drive the market. Increasing the adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the market in the forecast period.
The increasing interest of scientists and biotechnology companies in stem cell research will drive the market
The research that studies the properties of stem cells and their potential use in animal-derived is known as stem-cell research. Stem cells are the source of all tissues, by understanding their properties helps understanding of the healthy and diseased body's development and homeostasis. These cells always balance between self-renewal and differentiation. According to stem cell biology understanding and the latest technological developments parameters of stem cell culture are critical and need to be refined continuously. They hold great promise for cell therapy, tissue engineering, regenerative animal-derived, and pharmaceutical and biotechnological applications. They can self-renew and the ability to differentiate into specialized cell types depending upon their source of isolation. However, the use of SCs for clinical applications requires high quality and quantity of cells. This necessitates the large-scale expansion of SCs followed by efficient and homogeneous differentiation into functional derivatives. Traditional methods for maintaining and developing cells rely on two-dimensional (2-D) culturing techniques using plastic culture plates and xenogenic media. These methods provide limited expansion, cells tend to lose clonal and differentiation capacity upon long-term passaging.
Increasing the adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the cell culture protein surface coating market in the forecast period
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems have increased interest in drug discovery and tissue engineering due to their evident advantages in providing more physiologically relevant information and more predictive data for in vivo tests. A growing body of evidence has suggested that 3D cell culture systems, in contrast to the 2D culture system, represent more accurately the actual microenvironment where cells reside in tissues. Thus, the behavior of 3D-cultured cells is more reflective of in vivo cellular responses. Research has found that cells in the 3D culture environment differ morphologically and physiologically from cells in the 2D culture environment. The additional dimensionality of 3D cultures is the crucial feature leading to the differences in cellular responses. It not only influences the spatial organization of the cell surface receptors engaged in interactions with surrounding cells, but it also induces physical constraints to cells. These spatial and physical aspects in 3D cultures affect the signal transduction from the outside to the inside of cells and ultimately influence gene expression and cellular behavior. It has been demonstrated that cell responses in 3D cultures are more similar to in vivo behavior compared to 2D cultures. In the past several years, tremendous effort has been put into the development of a variety of 3D culture systems and the adoption of 3D cell culture systems in drug discovery, cancer cell biology, stem cell study, engineered functional tissues for implantation, and other cell-based analysis. Hence it will drive the market.
Research & Development Systems offer a range of microplates aseptically prepared and pre-coated with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins for quantifying cell adhesion and culturing adherent cell lines.
The drawbacks related to cell culture protein surface coating will hamper the market
The disadvantages of cell culture are: highly skilled personnel, techniques must be performed using strict asepsis techniques because animal cells grow slower than many of the common contaminants (e.g., bacteria, viruses, and fungi). Additionally, animal cells may not survive when isolated and, therefore, cannot have an independent sustainable existence without providing a complex environment. One of the main limitations of cell culture is the expense and effort required to obtain a relatively low amount of cells.
In addition, tissue composition is variable and heterogeneous. Replicas from the same sample have various constituents. To replicate an experimental result, cell lines must be manipulated many times in serial passages. For instance, every culture will be different from the original and less uniform in its constitution. The replicas are randomly mixed in each passage to resolve this issue, and the selective pressure of growing conditions tends to produce an optimal prevalent phenotype. These disadvantages will hamper the Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market
COVID-19 Impact Analysis
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the research and development sector globally. It has resulted in nationwide lockdown, impacting every industry. Likewise, the cell culture protein surface coating market is also affected because manufacturers shut down their business due to COVID-19 norms.
Segment Analysis
The precoating segment will dominate the cell culture protein surface coating market
Coating as an additional surface treatment stands for all additional modifications made to increase cell adhesion and the standard plasma or corona treatment performed on all cell culture plastic by the manufacturer. Usually, a coating is done with proteins or peptides. Corning BioCoat cell culture inserts are pre-coated with extracellular matrix proteins for applications requiring a protein-coated cell surface, such as cell adhesion, growth, invasion, migration, and differentiation. Coatings include Corning Matrigel® matrix, Fibronectin, Collagen, and Laminin.
Synthetic material will dominate the cell culture protein surface coating market
The growing demand for animal-free components will drive the market in this region. Synthetic material systems can be specifically designed to interact with cells on different length scales (e.g., molecular, cellular, and macroscopic) and thereby mimic the elements of natural stem cell niches. These synthetic materials offer the potential for improved control, repeatability, safety, and scalability in contrast with their natural counterparts.
To direct stem cell phenotype a broad variety of synthetic materials has been designed and created. Natural polymers, typically elements of mammalian ECM or structural components from other organisms (e.g., alginate or chitosan), can be chemically, thermally, or physically processed to alter their chemistry, mechanics, degradation, and biological performance. Synthetic polymers offer a wide range of controlled chemistries and mechanical properties due to the variety of available monomers and co-polymer structures. Popular synthetic polymer types include polyacrylamides, polyacrylates, polyethers, polyesters, polyhydroxy acids, polyfumarates, and polyphosphazene. Self-assembling peptides, peptide-amphiphiles, and genetically engineered proteins allow the incorporation of specific cell-engaging motifs into rationally designed chemical biology assemblies. Inorganic materials are used to mimic the osteogenic niche, while hybrids and composites combine the aforementioned classes to create unique, application-specific matrices.
Geographical Analysis
North America will dominate the market
The highly developed healthcare and research infrastructure and presence of advanced technology, presence of leading biotechnology companies will drive the market in this region. This region has a large focus on drug discovery.
Although last year pharmaceutical companies were unable to top the record-shattering 59 new drugs approved in the US in 2018, they are still on a roll. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration green-lighted 48 Animal-derived, a crop that includes myriad modalities and many new treatments for long-neglected diseases.
Based on latest revenues available as of 2020, Johnson & Johnson was the leading pharmaceutical company in the United States. The firm annually generates over 80 billion U.S. dollars, which is around 30 billion U.S. dollars more than Pfizer's next ranked company. However, Johnson & Johnson's total revenue also includes sales from their medical device and consumer health divisions, while Pfizer is a pure-play pharmaceutical company.
Competitive Landscape
Major key players cell culture protein surface coating market are Corning Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Merck KGaA, PerkinElmer, Inc., Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, BioVision, Inc., Trevigen Inc. BioVision, Inc., Manus Aktteva Biopharma, Donboo Amino Acid, Wuxi Enovo Chemical, and Xinyi Hanling Biological Engineering.
Key Companies to Watch
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
Overview: The world leader in serving science Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., with revenues of more than $24 billion and approximately 70,000 employees globally. Their mission is to enable customers to make the world cleaner, healthier, and safer. They help customers accelerate life sciences research, deliver animal-derived to market, improve patient diagnostics, solve complex analytical challenges, and increase laboratory productivity. The company offers a combination of unmatched innovative technologies, purchasing convenience and comprehensive services through premier brands Thermo Scientific, Unity Lab Services , Invitrogen, Fisher Scientific, and Applied Biosystems.
Product Portfolio: Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Supply Chain Programs and eCommerce, Laboratory Equipment, Lab Services, Specialty Diagnostics, Life Sciences, Pharma Services, and CDMO.
Key Development: On March 25, 2021, Thermo Fisher Scientific announced the completion of the U.S. FDA listing for the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 Dx Real-Time PCR System. The innovative product enables clinical laboratories, assay developers to meet testing demands and enhance their molecular diagnostics workflows.
The Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market report would provide an access to an approx. 52 market data table, 44 figures and 200 pages.
Trending Topics
Cell culture market
3D Cell Culture Market
Cell Surface Markers detection market

상세 목차

1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report
2. Market Definition and Overview
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Market Snippet By Coating Type
3.2. Market Snippet By Protein Source
4. Market Dynamics
4.1. Market Impacting Factors
4.1.1. Drivers
4.1.1.1. The increasing interest of scientists and biotechnology companies in stem cell research will drive the market
4.1.1.2. Increasing the adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the cell culture protein surface coating market in the forecast period
4.1.2. Restraints:
4.1.2.1. The drawbacks related to cell culture protein surface coating will hamper the market
4.1.3. Opportunity
4.1.4. Impact Analysis
5. Industry Analysis
5.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
5.2. Epidemiology Analysis
5.3. Supply Chain Analysis
5.4. Pricing Analysis
5.5. Regulatory Analysis
5.6. Reimbursement Analysis
5.7. Unmet Needs
6. COVID-19 Analysis
6.1. Analysis of Covid-19 on the Market
6.1.1. Before COVID-19 Market Scenario
6.1.2. Present COVID-19 Market Scenario
6.1.3. After COVID-19 or Future Scenario
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid Covid-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion
7. By Coating Type
7.1. Introduction
7.1.1. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type Segment
7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Coating Type Segment
7.2. Precoating*
7.2.1. Introduction
7.2.2. Market Size Analysis, US$ Million, 2018-2029 and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), 2020-2029
7.3. Self-coating
7.4. Multiwall/microwell plates
7.5. Petri dishes
7.6. Flasks
8. By Protein Source
8.1. Introduction
8.1.1. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Protein Source
8.2. Synthetic*
8.2.1. Introduction
8.2.2. Market Size Analysis, US$ Million, 2018-2029 and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), 2020-2029
8.3. Animal-derived
8.4. Human-derived
8.5. Plant-derived
9. By Region
9.1. Introduction
9.1.1. Market Size Analysis, US$ Million, 2018-2029 and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), 2020-2029, By Region
9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
9.2. North America
9.2.1. Introduction
9.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
9.2.3. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
9.2.4. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
9.2.5. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
9.2.5.1. U.S.
9.2.5.2. Canada
9.2.5.3. Mexico
9.3. Europe
9.3.1. Introduction
9.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
9.3.3. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
9.3.4. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
9.3.5. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
9.3.5.1. Germany
9.3.5.2. U.K.
9.3.5.3. France
9.3.5.4. Italy
9.3.5.5. Spain
9.3.5.6. Rest of Europe
9.4. South America
9.4.1. Introduction
9.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
9.4.3. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
9.4.4. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
9.4.5. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
9.4.5.1. Brazil
9.4.5.2. Argentina
9.4.5.3. Rest of South America
9.5. Asia Pacific
9.5.1. Introduction
9.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
9.5.3. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
9.5.4. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
9.5.5. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
9.5.5.1. China
9.5.5.2. India
9.5.5.3. Japan
9.5.5.4. Australia
9.5.5.5. Rest of Asia Pacific
9.6. Middle East and Africa
9.6.1. Introduction
9.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
9.6.3. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
9.6.4. Market Size Analysis, and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
10. Competitive Landscape
10.1. Key Developments and Strategies
10.2. Company Share Analysis
10.3. Product Benchmarking
10.4. List of Key Companies to Watch
10.5. List of Company with disruptive technology
10.6. List of Start Up Companies
11. Company Profiles
11.1. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.*
11.1.1. Company Overview
11.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
11.1.3. Key Highlights
11.1.4. Financial Overview
11.2. Corning Inc.
11.3. Merck KGaA
11.4. PerkinElmer, Inc
11.5. Greiner Bio-One International GmbH
11.6. BioVision, Inc.
11.7. Manus Aktteva Biopharma
11.8. Donboo Amino Acid
11.9. Wuxi Enovo Chemical
11.10. Xinyi Hanling Biological Engineering(*LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE)
12. DataM Intelligence
12.1. Appendix
12.2. About Us and Services
12.3. Contact Us

언급된 주요 기업들

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Corning Inc., Merck KGaA, PerkinElmer, Inc, Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, BioVision, Inc., Manus Aktteva Biopharma, Donboo Amino Acid, Wuxi Enovo Chemical

표 목록 (Tables)

List of Tables

Table 1 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2022, 2026 & 2030 (US$ Million)

Table 2 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2022, 2026 & 2030 (US$ Million)

Table 3 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Region, 2022, 2026 & 2030 (US$ Million)

Table 4 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2022, 2026 & 2030 (US$ Million)

Table 5 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 6 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2022, 2026 & 2030 (US$ Million)

Table 7 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 8 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Region, 2022, 2026 & 2030 (US$ Million)

Table 9 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Region, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 10 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 11 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 12 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Country, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 13 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 14 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 15 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Country, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 16 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 17 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 18 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Country, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 19 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 20 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 21 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Country, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 22 Middle East & Africa Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Coating Type, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 23 Middle East & Africa Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, By Protein Source, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Table 24 Thermo Fisher Scientific: Overview

Table 25 Thermo Fisher Scientific: Product Portfolio

Table 26 Thermo Fisher Scientific: Key Developments

Table 27 Corning: Overview

Table 28 Corning: Product Portfolio

Table 29 Corning: Key Developments

Table 30 Merck KGaA: Overview

Table 31 Merck KGaA: Product Portfolio

Table 32 Merck KGaA: Key Developments

Table 33 PerkinElmer, Inc: Overview

Table 34 PerkinElmer, Inc: Product Portfolio

Table 35 PerkinElmer, Inc: Key Developments

Table 36 Greiner Bio-One International GmbH (Greiner Group AG): Overview

Table 37 Greiner Bio-One International GmbH (Greiner Group AG): Product Portfolio

Table 38 Greiner Bio-One International GmbH (Greiner Group AG): Key Developments

Table 39 Agilent Technologies: Overview

Table 40 Agilent Technologies: Product Portfolio

Table 41 Agilent Technologies: Key Developments

Table 42 BRAND GMBH + CO KG (BrandTech Scientific, Inc.): Overview

Table 43 BRAND GMBH + CO KG (BrandTech Scientific, Inc.): Product Portfolio

Table 44 BRAND GMBH + CO KG (BrandTech Scientific, Inc.): Key Developments

Table 45 Kollodis BioSciences Inc: Overview

Table 46 Kollodis BioSciences Inc: Product Portfolio

Table 47 Kollodis BioSciences Inc: Key Developments

Table 48 DenovoMATRIX: Overview

Table 49 DenovoMATRIX: Product Portfolio

Table 50 DenovoMATRIX: Key Developments

Table 51 faCellitate(BASF): Overview

Table 52 faCellitate(BASF): Product Portfolio

Table 53 faCellitate(BASF): Key Developments

그림 목록 (Figures)

List of Figures

Figure 1 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 2 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Coating Type, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 3 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Protein Source, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 4 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Region, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 5 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Coating Type, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 6 Precoating Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 7 Multiwall/microwell plates Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 8 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Protein Source, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 9 Animal-derived Protein Source in Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 10 Synthetic Protein Source in Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 11 Human-derived Protein Source in Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 12 Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Y-o-Y Growth, By Region, 2022-2030 (%)

Figure 13 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 14 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 15 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 16 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 17 Middle East and Africa Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 18 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 19 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Coating Type, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 20 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Protein Source, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 21 North America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Country, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 22 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 23 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Coating Type, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 24 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Protein Source, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 25 South America Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Country, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 26 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 27 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Coating Type, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 28 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Protein Source, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 29 Europe Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Country, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 30 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 31 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Coating Type, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 32 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Protein Source, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 33 Asia-Pacific Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Country, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 34 Middle East & Africa Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Value, 2021-2030 (US$ Million)

Figure 35 Middle East & Africa Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Coating Type, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 36 Middle East & Africa Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market Share, By Protein Source, 2022 & 2030 (%)

Figure 37 Thermo Fisher Scientific: Financials

Figure 38 Corning: Financials

Figure 39 Merck KGaA: Financials

Figure 40 PerkinElmer, Inc: Financials

Figure 41 Greiner Bio-One International GmbH (Greiner Group AG): Financials

Figure 42 Agilent Technologies: Financials

Figure 43 BRAND GMBH + CO KG (BrandTech Scientific, Inc.): Financials

Figure 44 Kollodis BioSciences Inc: Financials

Figure 45 DenovoMATRIX: Financials

Figure 46 faCellitate(BASF): Financials